BSW Tax Blog

Federal and Louisiana Taxes

Category Archives: Louisiana Local Sales Taxes

Tax Collector's Attorney's Fee in Excess of Statutory 10% of Tax, Interest, and Penalty?

Nicole F. Gould, M.B.A., J.D.
State and Local Tax Controversy

Of Counsel—Baton Rouge
Phone:
225.381.3165 nicole.gould@bswllp.com

In Livingston Parish School Board, Through its Sales and Use Tax Division v. Highway 43, LLC, et al, 2012-0103 (La. App. 1st Cir., 5/23/2012) the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal has suggested in dicta that the tax collector’s cause of action for reimbursement of attorney’s fees may be in excess of 10% of the tax, penalty and interest.  La. R.S. 47.337.13.1 provides for the tax collector’s reimbursement of attorney’s fees for any collection action of final and due sales taxes in the amount of 10% of the tax, interest and panalty; however, the fees are to be reviewed for reasonableness.  The Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal stated that,

“We believe that the attorney fees can be higher or lower than ten percent if that would be reasonable in the instant case.”

However, this is only dicta.  The appellate court made judgment on other issues we are all well-versed in:  the local sales tax collector may proceed in district court for an injuction against the taxpayer’s pursuit of business when the taxes assessed are “due and final”, that any assessed taxes not appealled become “due and final”, and the taxpayer’s failure to file any defense prior to hearing is a bar to asserting any defenses at the hearing.  To read the full opinion, click here:  http://www.la-fcca.org/opiniongrid/opinionpdf/2012%20CA%200103%20Decision%20Appeal.pdf

Advertisement

Tax Collector’s Attorney’s Fee in Excess of Statutory 10% of Tax, Interest, and Penalty?

Nicole F. Gould, M.B.A., J.D.
State and Local Tax Controversy

Of Counsel—Baton Rouge
Phone:
225.381.3165 nicole.gould@bswllp.com

In Livingston Parish School Board, Through its Sales and Use Tax Division v. Highway 43, LLC, et al, 2012-0103 (La. App. 1st Cir., 5/23/2012) the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal has suggested in dicta that the tax collector’s cause of action for reimbursement of attorney’s fees may be in excess of 10% of the tax, penalty and interest.  La. R.S. 47.337.13.1 provides for the tax collector’s reimbursement of attorney’s fees for any collection action of final and due sales taxes in the amount of 10% of the tax, interest and panalty; however, the fees are to be reviewed for reasonableness.  The Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal stated that,

“We believe that the attorney fees can be higher or lower than ten percent if that would be reasonable in the instant case.”

However, this is only dicta.  The appellate court made judgment on other issues we are all well-versed in:  the local sales tax collector may proceed in district court for an injuction against the taxpayer’s pursuit of business when the taxes assessed are “due and final”, that any assessed taxes not appealled become “due and final”, and the taxpayer’s failure to file any defense prior to hearing is a bar to asserting any defenses at the hearing.  To read the full opinion, click here:  http://www.la-fcca.org/opiniongrid/opinionpdf/2012%20CA%200103%20Decision%20Appeal.pdf

Louisiana Resale Certificate is Now Applied For Annually

David R. Cassidy, B.A., J.D., M.L.
Corporate Tax

Partner—Baton Rouge
Phone: 225.381.8018 david.cassidy@bswllp.com

The Louisiana Department of Revenue has issued a Revenue Information Bulletin on the renewal of resale certificates by buyers. It must now be done on an annual basis. Although vendors can rely on a certificate up to its expiration date, the RIB also provides a website  for verification.  In order to protect itself from an accusation  of negligence by a tax collector for accepting a resale certificate, a vendor, as part of its standard operating procedure, should verify the validity of a  first time buyer’s  resale certificate when it is initially received and verify continuing customers’ certificates on an annual basis. The fact that the certificate has been verified should be noted on the certificate or in the customer’s file.

The RIB can viewed here:

http://revenue.louisiana.gov/forms/lawspolicies/RIB%2012-027.pdf

Vendors can verify a reseller’s ceritificate here:  http://www.revenue.louisiana.gov/sections/business/resalecertificate.aspx

It's the Tax Collector's Choice of Collection Method …At Any Time

La. R.S. 47:337.45(A) provides several alternative remedies for the tax collector to recover delinquent taxes:
(1) Assessment and distraint, as provided in R.S. 47:337.48 through 337.60.
(2) Summary court proceeding, as provided in R.S. 47:337.61.
( 3) Ordinary suit under the provisions of the general laws regulating actions for the enforcement of obligations.
However, if the Collector embarks on one remedy, can he switch?  In a tax collector friendly decision, the Louisiana 5th Circuit Court of Appeal says, “yes.”  Normand v. Randazzo, 11-308 (La. App. 5th Cir., 12/28/11), ___ So.3d __, writ denied 2012-0258 (La., 3/9/12).  The taxpayer was issued a proposed notice of sales tax assessment post audit.  On the day before the notice of final assessment issued, the taxpayer requested a hearing.  The hearing was had more than 60 days past the notice of final assessment, which is deemed by law as a final judgment at that point in time, and the tax collector denied to adjust the audit conclusions.  The Jefferson Parish tax collector then retained counsel and filed summary proceedings agains the taxpayer for the taxes, penalties, interest and and an additional attorney’s fee penalty in the amount of 10%.  The taxpayer prevailed in trial court becuase the tax collector did not properly perform the assessment and distraint procedure outlined by law.  Specifically, the trial found the notices to the taxpayer advising him of his rights to be lacking.
The Louisiana 5th Circuit Court of Appeal reversed with a heavy hand.  Holding that the tax collector may pursue a taxpayer under any one of the above three remedies, that he is not foreclosed to only one if one remedy is started, the tax collector was awarded a judgment for all taxes, penalties and interest thereon, the attorney’s fees in the amount of 10% and another attorney’s fee of $2,500 for appellate work.  The Louisiana Supreme Court denied writs, though two justices would have granted.  Maybe this rule of law in favor of the tax collector will be revisited.

It’s the Tax Collector’s Choice of Collection Method …At Any Time

La. R.S. 47:337.45(A) provides several alternative remedies for the tax collector to recover delinquent taxes:
(1) Assessment and distraint, as provided in R.S. 47:337.48 through 337.60.
(2) Summary court proceeding, as provided in R.S. 47:337.61.
( 3) Ordinary suit under the provisions of the general laws regulating actions for the enforcement of obligations.
However, if the Collector embarks on one remedy, can he switch?  In a tax collector friendly decision, the Louisiana 5th Circuit Court of Appeal says, “yes.”  Normand v. Randazzo, 11-308 (La. App. 5th Cir., 12/28/11), ___ So.3d __, writ denied 2012-0258 (La., 3/9/12).  The taxpayer was issued a proposed notice of sales tax assessment post audit.  On the day before the notice of final assessment issued, the taxpayer requested a hearing.  The hearing was had more than 60 days past the notice of final assessment, which is deemed by law as a final judgment at that point in time, and the tax collector denied to adjust the audit conclusions.  The Jefferson Parish tax collector then retained counsel and filed summary proceedings agains the taxpayer for the taxes, penalties, interest and and an additional attorney’s fee penalty in the amount of 10%.  The taxpayer prevailed in trial court becuase the tax collector did not properly perform the assessment and distraint procedure outlined by law.  Specifically, the trial found the notices to the taxpayer advising him of his rights to be lacking.
The Louisiana 5th Circuit Court of Appeal reversed with a heavy hand.  Holding that the tax collector may pursue a taxpayer under any one of the above three remedies, that he is not foreclosed to only one if one remedy is started, the tax collector was awarded a judgment for all taxes, penalties and interest thereon, the attorney’s fees in the amount of 10% and another attorney’s fee of $2,500 for appellate work.  The Louisiana Supreme Court denied writs, though two justices would have granted.  Maybe this rule of law in favor of the tax collector will be revisited.

A Pinch of SALT: Demystifying Accountant-Client Privileges in State Tax Litigation : SALT Online : State & Local Tax Attorneys : Sutherland Asbill & Brennan Law Firm

A Pinch of SALT: Demystifying Accountant-Client Privileges in State Tax Litigation : SALT Online : State & Local Tax Attorneys : Sutherland Asbill & Brennan Law Firm

Louisiana State and Local Sales Tax Refund Procedures Compared

Nicole F. Gould, M.B.A., J.D.
State and Local Tax Controversy

Of Counsel—Baton Rouge
Phone:
225.381.3165
nicole.gould@bswllp.com

Grounds for granting a refund of an overpayment due to:

 

State

Local

Taxpayer’s error in mathematical computation

X

X

Taxpayer’s construction of the law contrary to the collector’s at the time of payment

X

X

Taxpayer’s or Collector’s error, omission, or a mistake of fact of consequence to the determination of the tax liability

X

X

Collector’s change made in an assessment, notice, or billing

X

X

Subsequent determination taxpayer was entitled to pay tax at a reduced rate

X

X

Payment exceeded the amount shown on the return or voucher

X

X

La. R.S. 47:1621 and 337.77

Issuance and Reversal of the Refund:

 

State

Local

A refund ordered by judge must be issued in 45 days from the date the judgment becomes non-appealable.

X

Before the Collector issues a refund, he may determine if the taxpayer owes any other liability the Collector administers and credit that liability instead of issuing a refund.

X

X

Collector can use any collection means to recover a refund later-determined not an overpayment within 2 years from December 31 of the year the refund was paid.

X

X

Collector can use any collection means to recover a credit made later-determined not an overpayment within 2 years from December 31 of the year the refund was paid.

X

La. R.S. 47:1621, 1622, 337.77 and 337.78.

Interest on the refund of overpayment

 

State

Local

Interest is provided the taxpayer on an overpayment if it is credited against another liability.

*

X

Only 2% interest for first 60 days after the refund claim is made as penalty if the overpayment is due to taxpayer administrative error.

X

Interest begins to accrue at 2 % on an overpayment from the date of payment until the refund is requested.

X

Judicial interest accrues on an overpayment from the date of refund request, notice of payment under protest, or notice of intention to file suit to recover the overpayment until paid.

X**

Judicial interest accrues on an overpayment refund or credit beginning with the later of:  date the return was due, the date the first return for that period was filed, or the date the tax was paid until paid.

X

No interest is paid if taxpayer deliberately overpaid tax to gain interest.

X

X

No interest on refund or credit to pre-petition tax periods for taxpayers in bankruptcy.

X

X

La. R.S. 47:1624 and 337.80.

*Presumably, the state does not provide interest on an overpayment credited to the taxpayer’s account because there will be an offset of interest having accrued on the liability being credited.  La. R.S. 47:1624

**The local rate of interest on refunds initially appears to be less, but should be nonetheless judicial interest pursuant to La. R.S. 13:4202.

Deadline to Make Refund Claim

 

State

Local

Later of:i)      December 31st,  3 years from date the tax was due, orii)1 year from date the tax was paid.

X

X

Claim for refund must be filed with the Secretary before the deadline

X

Claim for refund must be received by the Collector before the deadline

X

La. R.S. 1623 and 337.79.

After the Refund is Denied or Ignored.

 

State

Local

If the Collector fails to act for 1 year or denies the refund claim, the taxpayer may request redetermination hearing within 30 days with the Collector.

X

The Secretary’s failure to respond to the refund claim is deemed a denial after 1 year.

X

Days from the Secretary’s/Collector’s date of certified mailing, denying the refund, the taxpayer has to appeal.

60

30

Forum in which the taxpayer appeals the denial of refund

BTA

District Court or Mandatory Arbitration

Once appeal is lodged, the Collector may assert a demand for any tax, interest or penalty due from refund tax period.*

X

X

La. R.S. 1625 and 337.81.

*The constitutional prescription of taxes should remain except for that amount needed to offset a refund claim.